Alex Gibney’s ‘Loopy, Not Insane’ Demystifies Cult of Serial Killer


In his newest documentary “Loopy, Not Insane”—screening at documentary movie competition IDFA—Alex Gibney offers the ground to Dr. Dorothy Otnow Lewis, a famend American psychiatrist who has examined quite a few serial killers. Specializing within the research of folks with dissociative identification dysfunction (DID), Lewis has concluded that many of the twentieth century’s most infamous murderers—together with Joel Rifkin, Joseph Paul Franklin and Arthur Shawcross—skilled horrific abuse as kids. “What occurs to us in our childhood can have a profound affect on who we find yourself as adults,” Gibney muses.

He has by no means been a “serial killer aficionado,” he admits, preferring to delve into the darkish aspect of human psychology fairly than wallow in grisly particulars. “How do you reckon with any individual who places you on a sizzling radiator, burns your pores and skin and in a while offers you hugs, telling you ways a lot they love you? Many of my movies are about so-called good individuals who do dangerous issues.”

Certainly, because the director tells Selection, it was really Dr. Lewis’s darkish sense of humor that attracted him to the venture. “It was one of the issues that made me wish to do the movie. It’s a bit of totally different from some of the stuff I’ve achieved, and I simply hope it’s intriguing to folks.” Initially known as “Dorothy and Ted,” the movie—narrated by Laura Dern—was initially purported to be structured round Dr. Lewis’s investigation into notorious serial killer Ted Bundy (“The Campus Killer”), whom she interviewed in 1989. Within the ultimate reduce, nonetheless, Bundy is simply a small half of a a lot larger story. “Bundy is that this magnetic power discipline that pulls you in,” explains Gibney, “and that’s why we left him for the tip. By the point you get to him, you’ll be able to see him not as somebody who’s so excessive, however as a component of a continuum. He isn’t so mysterious.”

Since his execution in 1989, Bundy has come to personify the very fashionable view of the serial killer as a charismatic monster, however Gibney takes a special view. “Persons are fascinated by Bundy,” he says, “as a result of he appears to be the paragon of pure evil: the handsome, charming man who had an idyllic childhood and was possessed by some demonic power we are going to by no means perceive. Seems that when you dig into the proof, there are indicators of excessive psychological illness and presumably a mind damage. His personal ridiculous claims that he turned a serial killer as a result of of pornography—which so many individuals purchased—I simply discover laughable. If pornography causes you to change into a serial killer, we have now lots of them.”

As an alternative of spending but extra time on the well-documented Bundy, Gibney focuses as a substitute on Dr. Lewis, whose cautious and really human interview fashion he praises. “There’s a sure fashion of interviewing that purposefully creates a distance between the interrogator and the topic. I don’t like that – I attempt to have a dialog.” For example, he cites forensic psychiatrist Park Dietz, who has additionally testified in lots of high-profile circumstances. “It’s as if he was an interrogation machine. He couldn’t care much less about that particular person as a human being,” Gibney alleges. “[But] Dorothy laughs, cries and she or he may be very cautious to not be shocked or contradict what they are saying. Folks she is interviewing are very defensive about being known as loopy, and I discover that fascinating too—loopy folks don’t prefer to be known as loopy! What I additionally discovered fascinating was her reliance on easy questions, fairly than grand, broad philosophical ones.”

In addition to coping with the crimes of serial killers, Gibney’s movie additionally addresses their punishment too—arguing that individuals have to re-examine their causes for wanting a loss of life penalty, the director factors out that within the states the place it’s authorized, murder charges really are usually larger.

“It’s serving as a sort of permission given by the society,” he notes. “We point out that in England, the regulation used to have this notion that being insane was punishment sufficient and but we misplaced [that idea] alongside the best way. Many individuals I talked to stated: ‘What do I care what occurs to a serial killer?’ The movie doesn’t attempt to recommend that you simply shouldn’t be horrified by these acts. However what’s the purpose of making up fiction, imagining that such an individual is evil versus disturbed or mentally imbalanced, and perhaps not in management? If the aim is for this to cease, then we should always know what causes it.”


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here