Condé Nast Denies Allegation Bon Appetit Pays Only White Editors for Movies, After Photo of EIC Adam Rapoport in Brown Face Surfaces – Variety


Adam Rapoport, editor-in-chief of Bon Appetit, got here underneath hearth Monday with calls for him to resign or be fired after an allegation that the Condé Nast meals title pays white editors — however not folks of shade — for video appearances. The cost got here after a photograph of Rapoport in brown face was posted on social media.

Requested for a response, a Condé Nast consultant mentioned it was unfaithful that Bon Appetit’s white editors are paid for showing in movies whereas folks of shade aren’t; the rep declined to remark additional. Rapoport didn’t reply to an e mail inquiry. [UPDATE: Rapoport, in a press release Monday, mentioned he was resigning as EIC of Bon Appetit.]

Sohla El-Waylly, a chef and restaurateur who was employed final 12 months as an assistant editor at Bon Appetit and has appeared in the BA Check Kitchen video sequence, mentioned on her Instagram Story Monday that solely white editors are paid to make video appearances for the journal’s digital channels. She mentioned she was employed at a wage of $50,000 to “help white editors with considerably much less expertise than me.”

“I’ve been pushed in entrance of video as a show of variety,” she wrote. “In actuality, presently solely white editors are paid for their video appearances. None of the folks of shade have been compensated for their appearances.”

El-Waylly mentioned she was demanding the resignation of Rapoport, and she or he alleged that this case is “only a symptom of the systemic racism that runs inside… Condé Nast as a complete.”

Follower her put up, Bon Appetit senior meals editor Molly Baz mentioned in an IG Story, “Please let or not it’s identified that I stand with my household @bonappetitmag and don’t assist the habits of our present editor in chief.”


Carla Lalli Music, Bon Appetit editor at massive, on her IG Story mentioned she supported Baz’s place.

El-Waylly was responding to an earlier picture posted on Twitter of Rapoport in brown face, evidently a Halloween costume, from an Instagram put up in 2013.

That, in flip, got here after Puerto Rican meals author Illyanna Maisonet over the weekend posted a textual content change with Rapoport about one of the journal’s editors rejecting her pitch for a narrative about Afro-Boricuas that make regional rice fritters. The Bon Appetit EIC reportedly agreed “we don’t have sufficient [Puerto Rican] meals on web site” (however “loads of different LatinX cuisines”) and urged Maisonet pitch a narrative for digital as a result of the print editions had been booked by the tip of 2020. In response to Maisonet’s query about why a narrative on Piñones (an space of Puerto Rico identified for its meals stalls) ran in the Could 2020 concern, Rapoport wrote that the “unofficial theme” of that concern was “accessible, reasonably priced summer time escapes.”

Additionally Monday, in a thread on Twitter, former Bon Appetit employees photographer Alex Lau mentioned he left the journal “for a number of causes, however one of the principle causes was that white management refused to make adjustments that my BIPOC coworkers and I continuously pushed for.”

“when i requested ‘why have we shot meals all world wide, however haven’t touched the complete continent of Africa?’, their response: ‘oh you realize, the recipes get tough, and readers in all probability wouldn’t wish to make the meals,’” Lau wrote on Twitter.

Lau alleged that it isn’t “solely a [Bon Appetit[ drawback. it is a conde nast drawback. blame roger moore, blame anna wintour, blame all of the folks in conde company that you simply’ve by no means heard of. they’re accountable for creating this tradition.”

Condé Nast, hit by the financial downturn amid the COVID-19 pandemic, final month mentioned it was shedding about 100 U.S. staff and placing one other 100 on unpaid go away for a number of months, amongst different cost-cutting measures. The corporate had about 6,000 staff initially of 2020.

The backlash towards Rapoport and Bon Appetit began after the EIC posted a letter Could 31, “Meals Has All the time Been Political,” in which Rapoport mentioned the publication could be “spotlighting Black-owned meals companies in cities nationwide. And also you’ll see us tackling extra of the racial and political points on the core of the meals world.” That elicited a response from meals author Korsha Wilson, who known as Rapoport’s put up “so f—ing empty.” She tweeted final week, “I personally know Black ladies & ladies of shade who had been gaslit, fired and their concepts utilized by y’all @bonappetit. Adam, what are you doing to repair your publication internally? Tackle that.”

The journal Monday posted an article of Black-owned eating places organized by metropolis, which the article mentioned is “one sensible, actionable approach to stand in solidarity with the Black group now, and at all times.”

Up to date 6 p.m. ET with Condé Nast consultant’s denial that Bon Appetit’s white editors are paid whereas folks of shade aren’t.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here