Despite the fact that Boca Juniors moved to regularize the security situation of the third southern tray of La Bombonera and the public complaints of Juan Román Riquelme, who pointed to the prosecutor Celsa Ramírez, the sector will be depopulated again for tomorrow’s meeting against Platense, as happened against Central Córdoba de Santiago del Estero for the Professional League. This was ruled by the Justice after the inspection that was carried out yesterday afternoon in the Alberto J. Armando.
Riquelme’s annoyance against the prosecutor who closed the Bombonera: “You would have to ask the lady what painting it is from”
Vice President Xeneize was highly obfuscated by the closure of one of the stands of the Alberto J. Armando stadium and pointed to Celsa Ramírez
The Court of 1st instance in criminal, misdemeanor and misdemeanors No. 1 had reported last Thursday that until the institution complied with a series of requested requirements, the preventive closure measure of the Superior South Tribune of Club Atlético Boca Juniors was going to to stay. Awaiting the presentations of the General Directorate of Aid and Emergency Guard (a body dependent on the City Government), the report prepared by the civil engineering studio Pozzi Azzaro (hired by Boca) and that of the Safety Committee in the Soccer, another inspection was carried out that did not have satisfactory results for the institution xeneize.
Now he was asked Executing Unit of Soccer Stadiums urgently dictate: a) information and regulations on administrative acts and rules on safety criteria in massive structures in stadiums; b) if the repairs reported by Boca meet those specified standards; and c) if the third southern flag guarantees safety.
After Riquelme’s complaints, they ratified the closure of a grandstand in La Bombonera: the requirements that Boca must meet to raise it
Román pointed to the prosecutor who ruled the closure of a popular stand that has not yet been enabled for Sunday’s game against Platense
At the same time, the club’s lawyer was notified that the report submitted by Boca lacks a clarification under the signature with the identification and license plate of the professional who carried it out, that the official experts were not given due intervention. in the tests tested in the stadium, that the weight supported in static load by the grandstand with capacity for 5 thousand people was not estimated, nor was the coefficient of variation of the same static to dynamic load, and if the corresponding study was carried out to determine the absence of risk of demolition, detachment or collapse of said grandstand.
“You would have to ask the lady (by Celsa Ramírez) what painting it is from. Hopefully now that we know that everything is in order, that things will be presented this afternoon, he will work until Saturday and enable it as it should be because it harms the fan. I ask the lady to let the fans go and enjoy the show because they are the owners of our house”, Riquelme had declared before the Justice ratified the closure of the rostrum that Román looks to his left from his box in the basketball court.
Hugo Ibarra’s broom: two forced changes and at least two other tacticians appear in Boca to receive Platense
The coach xeneize would make several modifications thinking about the duel on Sunday at La Bombonera against the team led by Martín Palermo
THE COMPLETE DECREE
Autonomous City of Buenos Aires,
As received, keep in mind both what was requested by the Private Defender, and what was ruled by the Prosecutor.
In this sense, pondering the observations made by the official experts in their report, whose conclusions ratify and sustain the suspicion threshold in relation to the structural and building conditions of the South Superior Tribune of the Boca Juniors Athletic Club; It is appropriate, taking into account the magnitude and technical complexity of the matter, as well as the legal rights in dispute, to expand and require accurate and specific information, in order to have conclusive elements that allow clearing up any hint of risk.
Precisely, in the first place, and without prejudice to the remission of reports from different government agencies, the Soccer Stadium Execution Unit is required to, within the framework of its powers, functions and obligations (conf. Art. 6 and 8 of the law 5847) dictate as a matter of urgency: a) inform and point out the regulations, administrative acts, norms that establish the criteria of security and criticality of massive structures in matters of stadiums and accompany them; b) if the repairs reported by the institution meet said standards imposed by the specific regulations that regulate the matter, responding to criteria of criticality and massive structures; and c) if the Upper South Tribune of the stadium, under such parameters, guarantees safety, being able to rule out any type of risk for the spectators.
Secondly, and taking into account a broad criterion of the right of defense, notify the lawyer of the institution, about the observations made by the party experts, in order to ratify, rectify, or make the presentation that he deems appropriate by law; in relation to: a) that the exhibited “technical” report shows a signature without clarification, and without the correct identification of the professional and his qualifying registration; b) the reasons for which the official experts were not duly involved in the tests tested in the stadium, as expressly required; c) that they report the estimated weight that the grandstand supports in static load, taking into account its capacity of five thousand spectators; d) what is the coefficient of variation of that same static to dynamic load; e) if there is certainty that the coefficient of elasticity of movement of the structure supports the weight in dynamic load as recorded, in the game of last January 29, and if it ensures, with a degree of probability bordering on the certainty beyond all doubt, the absence of any risk of collapse, detachment, or collapse of the upper south tribune.
KEEP READING:
